|
CARVAKA
Carvaka, also frequently transliterated as Charvaka or Cārvāka, and also known as Lokayata or Lokyāta, is a thoroughly materialistic and atheistic school of thought with ancient roots in India. It is stongly embedded in the mayawadi or hedonist philosophy which religion seeks counter.
Loss of original works
Available evidence suggests that Carvaka philosophy was set out in the Brhaspati Sutra in India, probably about 600 BCE. Neither this text nor any other original text of the Carvaka school of philosophy has been preserved. Its principal works are known only from fragments cited by its Hindu and Buddhist opponents. Carvaka philosophy appears to have died out some time after 1400 CE.
Countering the argument that the Carvakas opposed all that was good in the Vedic tradition, Dale Riepe says, "It may be said from the available material that Carvakas hold truth, integrity, consistency, and freedom of thought in the highest esteem." [1]
Madhavacharya and Carvaka system
Madhavacharya, the 14th-century Vedantic philosopher from South India starts his famous work The Sarva-darsana-sangraha with a chapter on the Carvaka system with the intention of refuting it. After invoking, in the Prologue of the book, the Hindu gods Siva and Vishnu, ("by whom the earth and rest were produced"), Madhavacharya asks, in the first chapter:
- ...but how can we attribute to the Divine Being the giving of supreme felicity, when such a notion has been utterly abolished by Charvaka, the crest-gem of the atheistic school, the follower of the doctrine of Brihaspati? The efforts of Charvaka are indeed hard to be eradicated, for the majority of living beings hold by the current refrain:
-
- While life is yours, live joyously;
- None can escape Death's searching eye:
- When once this frame of ours they burn,
- How shall it e'er again return?
Those parts which survive indicate a strong anti-clerical bias, accusing Brahmins of fostering religious beliefs only so they could obtain a livelihood. The proper aim of a Charvakan or Charvaka, according to these sources, was to live a prosperous, happy, and productive life in this world.
Systems of ancient Indian thought can be divided into two broad classes: the Carvaka and Vedanta philosophies. Buddhism and Jainism were originally major atheistic branches, though they later came to incorporate theistic concepts alien to them.
Meaning of the word carvaka
The Sanskrit word chaarvaaka is generally understood to be a compound of two words chaari and vaak. Chaari means "sweet" or "attractive", and vaak means "speaking". Some other meanings are also ascribed to the word, but "sweet speaking" is the most plausible. This school of thought was also called Lokayata, probably from pre-Vedic times. "Lokayata" would broadly mean "prevalent among people" or "prevalent in the world" (loka and ayata).
Brihaspati and Lokayata
It is said that the Hindu sage Brihaspati, the preceptor of the Vedic gods, founded and preached the Lokayata thought, though this involves a number of contradictions with Hindu scriptures which would aver otherwise. In all likelihood, the relevant Brihaspati was another philosopher of the same name. Ancient texts like Brhati, a commentary on Saabarbhaashya, Sarvadarsanasangraha, etc., mention Brihaspati as the founder and champion of the Carvaaka doctrine.[citation needed]
The best-known verse attributed to Brihaspati enunciated a principle that is ironically used by the opponents as a handle to beat them with:
- Yavajjivet sukham jivet
- Rinam kritvaa ghritam pibet
- Bhasmibhutasya dehasya
- Punaraagamanam kutah
(As long as you live, live happily, take a loan and drink ghee. After a body is reduced to ashes where will it come back from?)
In Ayurveda, a Hindu medicinal system, "ghee is life" (aayurghritam) is a standard quotation. This is the seventh verse in a set of eleven in Sarvadarsana Sangraha. These verses criticise the financial benefits earned by Brahmins in religious functions. Whether the words are Brihaspati's or not is doubtful, but the sense does agree with the Chaarvaaka line of thinking. Ghee occupied a central place: it was symbolic of good food and had long been a primary offering to the sacrificial fire of Hindu ceremonies.
The Carvakas took to the idea that good-living, symbolized by ghee, was the route to self-fulfillment. Critics of the Carvaka school see this cleaving to only artha and kama, without regard of dharma (and ultimate moksha) as an extreme of self-centred hedonism.
In the Hindu epic Mahabharata, Carvaka, who was a friend of Duryodhana, was burned alive. This Charvaka was one of the few descendants of the then ancient Charvakas as per Krishna, the avatar of the Hindu god of preservation, Vishnu.[2]
Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism versus Carvaka
Carvakas cultivated a philosophy wherein theology and what they called "speculative metaphysics" were to be avoided. The Carvakas accepted direct perception as the surest method to prove the truth of anything. Though their opponents tried to caricature the Lokayatikas' arguments, the latter did not completely reject the method of inference. Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya quotes S. N. Dasgupta:
- "Purandara (a Lokayata philosopher) [...] admits the usefulness of inference in determining the nature of all worldly things where perceptual experience is available; but inference cannot be employed for establishing any dogma regarding the transcendental world, or life after death or the law of karma which cannot be available to ordinary perceptual experience." [3]
A Carvaka's thought is characterised by an insistence on joyful living, whereas Buddhism and Jainism are known to emphasise penance. Enjoyment of life in a tempered manner, much like the Epicureans of Greece, was the Carvakas' primary modus operandi.
The Carvakas did not deny the difference between the dead and the living and recognised both as realities. A person lives, the same person dies: that is a perceived, and hence the only provable, fact. In this regard, the Carvakas found themselves at odds with all the other religions of the time. Of the five fundamental elements, the Panchamahaabhutas, Prithvi (earth or solidity), jal (water or liquidity), agni (fire or fieriness or brightness), vaayu (wind or movement), and aakaasha (aether or emptiness), the Carvakas recognised the validity of only the first four and thought that a combination of these four elements produced a certain vitality called life.
Rejection of the soul as separate from the body led the Carvakas to confine their thinking to this world only. This does not mean that they denied the cause-effect relationship. They accepted the "like causes like result" (Karmavipaaka) rule, restricted it to this life and this world and admitted exceptions to that rule.
Whereas most systems of Hindu philosophy advocated a caste system, the Carvakas denounced the caste system, calling it artificial, unreal and hence unacceptable. "What is this senseless humbug about the castes and the high and low among them when the organs like the mouth, etc in the human body are the same?" [4]
The Carvaka scholars carried on research, termed Aanvikshiki, into every branch of knowledge and developed it elaborately. It is possible that they also observed and kept records of the historical supernovae, which the Chinese, the Incas and Mayans and all other ancient civilizations did, as per records left to posterity in the form of astrological writings (Chinese) and cave paintings (Incas and Mayans). However, the Indian records have not yet come to light, perhaps due to the predominance of oral tradition in India, liable to easy distortion. More probably, any records have been destroyed by the Carvakas' opponents.[5]
Abul Fazl on Lokayata
Aaine-Akbari, written by Abul Fazl, the famous historian of Akbar's court, mentions a symposium of philosophers of all faiths held in 1578 at Akbar's insistence. Some Carvaka thinkers are said to have participated in this symposium.[6]
Under the heading "Nastika," Abul Fazl has referred to the good work, judicious administration, and welfare schemes that were emphasised by the Carvaka lawmakers. Somadeva has also mentioned the Carvaka method of defeating the enemies of the nation.
Lokayata on the role of women
The Carvakas criticised traditional attitudes towards women. In the Naishadhiya (17.42) a character named Carvaka says, "Fie upon the men who restrict women out of jealousy. Men and women both have passion, but their restrictions are directed towards women only; men are not subject to any restrictions."
See also
Notes
- ^ Motilal Banarasidas, The Naturalistic Tradition of Indian Thought (Varanasi) p.75
- ^ Shantiparva, Mahabharata (Adhyaayas) pp 38, 39
- ^ Indian Philosophy, p. 188
- ^ Prabodhachandrodaya, 2.18
- ^ A short novel on this theme is The Cosmic Explosion by J. V. Narlikar, published by Children's Book Trust, New Delhi, India, translated into English from the original Marathi.
- ^ Aaine-Akbari, Vol. III, translated by H. S. Barrett, pp 217–218 (also see Amartya Sen [2005], pp 288–289)
Bibliography
- Bhatta, Jayarashi. Tattvopapalavasimha (Charvaka Philosophy).
- Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad (1959). Lokayata: A Study in Ancient Indian Materialism. New Delhi: People's Pub. House.
- Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad (1964). Indian Philosophy: A Popular Introduction. New Delhi: People's Pub. House.
- Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad (1969). Indian Atheism: A Marxist Analysis. Kolkata: Manisha.
- Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad (1976). What Is Living and What Is Dead in Indian Philosophy. New Delhi: People's Pub. House.
- Mádhava Áchárya [1882] (1996). The Sarva-darsana-samgraha: or Review of the Different Systems of Hindu Philosophy, trans. E. B. Cowell and A. E. Gough, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 81-208-1341-3.
- Nambiar, Sita Krishna (1971). Prabodhacandrodaya of Krsna Misra. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.
- Phillott, D. C. (ed.) [1927] (1989). The Ain-i Akbari, by Abu l-Fazl Allami, trans. H. Blochmann, 3 vols., Delhi: Low Price Publications. ISBN 81-85395-19-5 (set).
- Riepe, Dale (1964). The Naturalistic Tradition of Indian Thought, 2nd ed., Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
- Salunkhe, A. Ha. Aastikashiromani Chaarvaaka (in Marathi).
- Sen, Amartya (2005). The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 0-7139-9687-0.
External links
|